I've recently started reading unChristian by David Kinnaman and Gabe Lyons, which looks at attitudes to Christianity among young adults (16-29) in the US. This is a group among whom respect for Christianity has plummetted over the last ten years - which I think is hardly surprising. Between the political antics and abuses of the religious right since they got influence; the US Episcopal Church tearing itself apart so unlovingly; the Southern Baptist Convention doing its own arrogant thing; and a general anti-religious trend after 9/11: it hasn't been a good decade for US churches (nor indeed for the rest of us).
Kinnaman is president of The Barna Group, a religion-focussed market research organisation, so the book has plenty of facts and figures. But the problem with Barna has always been that they filter everything through their own, strongly evangelical, approach to the world, which makes their data difficult to use. This book has the same problem.
One glaring example is where he analyses peoples' responses according to whether they have a 'biblical worldview', which he defines by saying "A person with a biblical worldview experiences, interprets, and responds to reality in the light of the Bible's principles". In market research terms, he then defines that in terms of eight statements which such people agree or agree strongly with:-
Whilst I don't have a great problem with any of these statements in themselves, they do not constitute, or even come close to defining, a Biblical worldview; what they do is simply reflect the worldview of a particular conservative US evangelical tradition. A true Biblical worldview has to start from what the Bible says and emphasises, not just echo the cultural beliefs of a religious tradition.
I know several readers of this blog have a good working knowledge of the Bible, so what do you think defines a 'biblical worldview' - in eight or less agree/disagree statements? And why?
Here's my stab:-
What's your list?
To be honest, I don't have a list. There is truth. There are
interpretations of the truth. And there are manipulators of the truth - of
which there are many. Spirituality is the truth. Religion, including the
Bible, is man's interpretation of that truth through denominations. And
the slicksters who are out for riches, material things and power.
Spiritualists see the harmony in life, even though we are all on our own
wavelength. Religion focuses on the duality of good and evil - even
personifying evil. Rarely, seeing the individuals responsibility.
Spiritualists know of our responsibility through Spritiual Law.
Interesting, Capt. I'll pull out some of those points for more reflection;
I hope without doing too much damage to your original meaning.
Not bad!! I'm in agreement that many perspectives are needed to truly
experience the truth. I've mentioned on a few occasions that it's being
able to take many perspectives that allows for one to see the nature of
reality better. Remember, to me viewing reality comes from taking clusters
of perspectives. The difference being, not to judge but to observe. The
information regarding reality comes through this observation. Religion
often makes a judgment out of its observations, yet tend to fail to JUDGE
RIGHTEOUS JUDGMENT.